- What newsletter software does (the plain version)
- Newsletter software versus "email marketing platform" versus Substack
- My own switch, and what it taught me
- The uncomfortable bit most posts on this topic skip
- Do you need it? A quick checklist
- What it costs in 2026
- The bit people forget: you own this list, you don't own a platform
- What I'd tell someone starting from zero right now
- Frequently asked questions
- Sources worth reading
The short version: Newsletter software is the tool that lets you collect email addresses, write to a list, and send that email out without it landing in spam or crashing your inbox provider. You need it the moment you have more than a handful of people who want to hear from you regularly, and not one day before. Most people who buy it never send anything worth reading, and that's the actual problem, not the software.
What newsletter software does (the plain version)
Strip away the marketing language and newsletter software does three jobs. It stores a list of email addresses. It gives you a way to write and format an email without touching code. And it sends that email to hundreds or thousands of people at once without your own email provider flagging you as a spammer.
That last bit matters more than people think. Gmail and Outlook will throttle or block an account that sends the same message to 300 people from a personal inbox. Send that same email through Mailchimp, Kit (formerly ConvertKit), or beehiiv and it goes out through servers built for bulk sending, with the authentication records that stop it landing in junk. That's the whole reason this category of software exists. It's plumbing, not magic.
On top of that plumbing, most tools bung in extras: signup forms, landing pages, automated welcome sequences, tagging so you can send different things to different segments, and open and click reporting so you can see who's paying attention. Some of that is useful. A lot of it is filler that gets used once and forgotten.
Newsletter software versus "email marketing platform" versus Substack
People use these terms as if they're different things and they mostly aren't. A newsletter tool, an email marketing platform, and something like Substack all do the same core job, they just lean different directions:
- Newsletter-first tools (Kit, beehiiv, Buttondown) are built around one long email you write regularly, with simple automation.
- Email marketing platforms (Mailchimp, Klaviyo, ActiveCampaign) lean harder into automation, ecommerce triggers, and segmentation, aimed at people running abandoned-cart emails or drip sequences for a store.
- Substack and beehiiv's publishing side bundle the sending tool with a public reading page and, for Substack, a built-in payments system that takes 10 percent of any paid subscription revenue on top of Stripe's cut.
If you're running a shop and want to email people who abandoned their basket, you want Klaviyo, not Substack. If you're a consultant writing one email a week to people who signed up from your blog, a plain newsletter tool is plenty, and I've written more on how to generate leads for your store's newsletter if the list-building side is where you're stuck, not the sending.
My own switch, and what it taught me
I ran my list through Mailchimp for years because that's what everyone used in 2015. By 2020 I had close to 40,000 subscribers on paper and open rates sitting around 11 percent, which sounds bad because it was bad. I moved to ConvertKit (now Kit) mostly because the automation was easier to build without hiring a developer, and I did a proper list clean at the same time, removing anyone who hadn't opened an email in over a year.
My list dropped to about 14,000. My open rate jumped to 34 percent within two sends. Nothing about the writing changed. The software didn't fix anything. Cutting 26,000 people who'd stopped caring fixed it. That's the bit software companies don't put in their case studies, because "delete most of your list" doesn't sell software.
The tool made the automation easier to build and the reporting easier to read, and that's worth something. But if I'd switched platforms without cutting the dead weight, I'd have carried the same problem into the new tool with a nicer dashboard.
The uncomfortable bit most posts on this topic skip
Here's the thing nobody selling newsletter software will tell you: buying the tool is the easy part, and most people who buy it stop there. I've watched clients sign up for a paid plan, build a lovely signup form, get 200 subscribers from a launch push, send two newsletters, and then go quiet for four months. The software didn't fail them. They didn't have anything to say on a schedule, and no tool fixes that.
The honest sequencing is: figure out what you're writing and how often, prove to yourself you can do that for six weeks by hand if you have to (a Google Doc and BCC works for the first 50 people), and only then pay for software to handle the scale you've built. Buying the £29-a-month plan before you've written six good emails is buying insurance for a fire that hasn't started.
Do you need it? A quick checklist
Run through this honestly before you subscribe to anything:
- Do you have more than 50 people who've asked to hear from you, not just people on a list you bought or scraped?
- Are you sending, or planning to send, at least twice a month? A tool sitting unused is still a monthly charge.
- Do you need automation, like a welcome sequence for new subscribers or a cart-abandonment email for a store? If yes, that alone justifies the cost.
- Do you need proof of consent and unsubscribe handling for compliance (GDPR in the UK and EU, CAN-SPAM in the US)? Free tools and personal email accounts don't manage this, and that's a real legal exposure, not a nice-to-have.
- Would you rather spend three hours a week writing than fighting spam filters and formatting?
If you answered yes to two or more of those, get the software. If you're mostly answering "not yet," spend your energy on starting a blog or building content that earns you the subscribers first. A tool with nobody on the list is a bill, not an asset.
What it costs in 2026
Real numbers, not "contact us for pricing":
Want AI doing the heavy lifting in your marketing?
I build the systems that handle the boring 80 percent, so you get your week back. Done properly, with the human kept in.
- Mailchimp: free up to 500 contacts with limited features, then plans start around $13/month and climb fast once automation and multiple audiences come into play.
- Kit (ConvertKit): free for up to 10,000 subscribers on broadcast-only sending, paid Creator plan starts around $25/month once you want automation and sequences.
- beehiiv: free up to 2,500 subscribers, then paid tiers from roughly $34/month, popular with people who want a public newsletter page and referral tools.
- Substack: free to send, no monthly fee, but they take 10 percent of any paid subscription revenue on top of payment processing fees.
- Brevo (formerly Sendinblue): free up to 300 emails a day, paid plans from around $9/month, a decent choice for very small lists on a tight budget.
None of these is "the best," they're built for slightly different jobs. If you want a wider comparison against other tools in your stack, I've broken down what's worth paying for in best content creation tools in 2026, and if budget is the actual blocker, there's a full list in 30 free business tools that includes options with no trial trap and no forced upgrade.
The bit people forget: you own this list, you don't own a platform
This is the actual argument for bothering with newsletter software at all rather than just posting on social media. Instagram can change its algorithm overnight and halve your reach. A Facebook Group can get shut down, sold on, or quietly buried by the platform's own priorities, and I've written before about how much a Facebook Group is worth in real terms, which is less than most owners think once you account for how little control you have over it.
An email list, exported and backed up, is yours. You can move it between Mailchimp, Kit, and beehiiv in an afternoon with a CSV file. Nobody can deplatform your list. That portability, not the fancy automation, is the real reason to build one instead of only building a following.
What I'd tell someone starting from zero right now
Don't buy software this week. Write five emails to a BCC list of friends, clients, or past customers, by hand, over five weeks. If you keep doing it and people reply, sign up for a free tier of Kit or beehiiv and move your list over. Build one simple welcome automation. Then, and only then, look at paid plans once your free tier's subscriber cap is the thing stopping you from growing, not before.
I build these as an AI automation consultant for owner-led businesses.
Related: writing for us on news.
Related: software: guidelines and how to pitch.
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between newsletter software and an email marketing platform?
Mostly marketing language. Newsletter-first tools like Kit and beehiiv are built around one regular long-form email with light automation. Email marketing platforms like Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign lean harder into ecommerce triggers, segmentation, and multi-step campaigns. Both do the core job of storing a list and sending bulk email without landing in spam.
Do I need newsletter software if I only have 50 subscribers?
Not urgently. A free tier or even a manual BCC email works fine under a few hundred people, and it forces you to write before you spend money. Move to paid software once you need automation, segmentation, or you're sending to a list large enough that deliverability starts becoming an issue on a personal email account, usually somewhere past a few hundred contacts.
Is Substack newsletter software?
Yes, with a twist. It handles list storage and sending like any other tool, but it also gives your newsletter a public reading page and built-in paid subscriptions, for which Substack takes 10 percent of subscription revenue on top of standard payment processing fees.
What newsletter software does Lilach use?
I run my list on Kit (formerly ConvertKit) after moving over from Mailchimp, mainly for the automation tools and cleaner tagging. The switch itself didn't fix my open rates, cutting inactive subscribers did that, but the platform makes running sequences and reporting far less painful day to day.