Asset 20 8 2
Does AI recommend your business? Run the free check →

Join 15,000 business owners, marketers and entrepreneurs. The Sunday newsletter you'll be annoyed only arrives once a week.

Article

What Does a Content Maker Do, and Do You Need One in 2026?

If you are skim reading
The short version: a content maker is the person who turns your ideas, your product, or your expertise into the videos, posts, graphics, and written pieces that show up in front of your audience, and yes, most small businesses trying to grow online need one, b

The short version: a content maker is the person who turns your ideas, your product, or your expertise into the videos, posts, graphics, and written pieces that show up in front of your audience, and yes, most small businesses trying to grow online need one, but only after they've worked out what they're trying to say. Hire one too early and you get a lot of nice looking content that goes nowhere. Hire one at the right point and you get your best asset for growth this year.

What a content maker does, day to day

Strip away the job title and the LinkedIn bio, and a content maker does three things on repeat: they make things, they publish things, and they adapt things. That's it. The rest is detail.

On any given week, a decent content maker working with a small business might be:

  • Filming and editing three to five short videos for Reels, TikTok, or YouTube Shorts
  • Writing and designing ten to fifteen social posts, pulled from a handful of core ideas
  • Turning one long piece (a webinar, a podcast episode, a blog post) into eight to twelve smaller pieces
  • Building simple graphics, carousels, or quote cards in something like Canva or Adobe Express
  • Scheduling everything so it goes out at the right time without anyone touching it daily
  • Checking what performed the week before and adjusting the next batch

Notice what's missing from that list: strategy. A content maker's job is to make and distribute content, not to decide who you're for, what you're selling, or why anyone should care. That distinction matters more than most job descriptions admit, and it's the reason so many businesses hire someone into this role and still feel like nothing's moving.

Content maker versus content creator versus content writer

People use these three terms as if they're interchangeable. They're not, and knowing the difference will save you from hiring the wrong person.

A content writer produces long-form text: blog posts, email sequences, website copy. A content creator usually means someone with their own audience, building content under their own name or brand, the way influencers do. A content maker is closer to a production role, someone employed or contracted to make content for someone else's brand, on a schedule, at volume. In practice the terms blur constantly and job ads mix them up, but if you're hiring, ask directly: are they writing, are they filming and editing, or are they doing both plus design? Get specific before you agree a rate.

A real example of when it worked and when it didn't

Five years ago, when I was rebuilding my own business after losing most of my speaking income overnight, I brought in a young content maker to help me get consistent on video. She was good at her job. skilled with editing, quick with trends, understood pacing better than I did. For the first six weeks the numbers looked fine on the surface, decent views, a few thousand followers gained.

But nothing converted. No enquiries, no bookings, nothing. Why? Because I hadn't told her what I wanted people to do after watching. I'd handed her raw footage and a vague brief ("talk about AI and marketing") and let her make what she thought would perform. She did her job well. I hadn't done mine.

Once I sat down and gave her three specific messages, one offer, and one call to action per week, everything changed. Same person, same skill set, completely different result, because the strategy problem got fixed first. That's the uncomfortable bit nobody selling content services tells you: a great content maker cannot fix a business that doesn't know what it's saying. They will happily make beautiful, well-edited content that goes precisely nowhere, and they'll do it fast, because that's what you asked for.

What it costs in 2026

Rates vary wildly depending on where you're hiring and what's included, but here's what's realistic right now:

  • Freelance content maker, UK based, part time (video plus basic graphics): £600 to £1,500 a month for a small business posting three to four times a week
  • Full time in-house content maker, UK: £24,000 to £34,000 a year, more in London, less outside major cities
  • Agency or fractional content team: £1,500 to £4,000 a month, usually with a wider range of formats and someone senior overseeing strategy too
  • US freelance rates: $30 to $75 an hour, or $2,000 to $5,000 a month for a consistent monthly package
  • Fiverr or Upwork, entry level: as low as $200 to $500 a month, but expect to manage them closely and rewrite briefs more than once

The gap between the cheapest and most expensive options isn't really about skill with a camera or editing software. It's about how much thinking they can do without you. Cheaper people need tighter briefs. Expensive people can take a rough idea and run with it.

Do you need one, or do you need something else first

Here's the question I'd want someone to ask me before I spent a penny: do you have a message worth repeating, or are you hoping the content maker will find one for you?

If you can't answer, in one sentence, who you help and what you help them do, a content maker isn't your next hire. What you need is an afternoon with a notebook, or a conversation with someone who does fractional CMO work for a few hours, to get the strategy straight first. That costs less than a bad six months of content that goes nowhere, and it's the step almost everyone skips because hiring a content maker feels like progress and sitting with a blank page doesn't.

Work with me

Want AI doing the heavy lifting in your marketing?

I build the systems that handle the boring 80 percent, so you get your week back. Done properly, with the human kept in.

If you already have that message, and you're just not consistent, or your posts look amateurish, or you know video works for your industry but you haven't touched a camera in three months, then yes, hire one. That's the exact gap a content maker closes.

Signs you need one

  • You have expertise and clients love working with you, but your social presence hasn't been updated in months
  • You're spending three or four hours a week trying to edit your own videos badly
  • You know consistency drives results but you keep dropping off after two good weeks
  • You have a backlog of great raw material (webinars, calls, podcast episodes) with nobody turning it into anything
  • Your competitors are visibly more active online and it's starting to cost you enquiries

If two or more of those describe you, the return on hiring is usually fast. I've seen small B2B businesses go from posting once a fortnight to five times a week within a month of bringing someone in, purely because there was finally a person whose job it was to make it happen, rather than it being the thing everyone means to get to.

What good briefing looks like, step by step

The difference between a content maker who thrives and one who flounders almost always comes down to the brief. Here's the version I use now, after learning the hard way:

  1. Write down three core messages you want repeated, not fifty ideas, three
  2. Name one action you want people to take after seeing the content (book a call, sign up, reply to a DM)
  3. Give three to five examples of content you like the tone of, even if they're competitors'
  4. Set a realistic weekly volume together, don't guess, agree it
  5. Review after two weeks, not two days, content needs time to show a pattern

That five-step process took me from a content maker who made nice things nobody acted on, to one whose work directly fed into lead generation that booked calls.

Tools they'll probably use, and where it gets confusing

Most content makers lean on a small stack of tools rather than expensive software: CapCut or Premiere for editing, Canva or Adobe Express for graphics, and increasingly AI tools to speed up scripting and repurposing. If branding comes up as part of the brief, which it often does with smaller businesses, they might also touch logo and design work. I've compared the two most common starting points for that in my Design.com versus Canva breakdown, and if budget is tight there's a rundown of the best free logo makers worth knowing before you pay for anything. If you're weighing up whether a paid platform like Design.com is worth it at all, I've laid out exactly what it does well and where it falls short in a full Design.com review.

Platform matters too. A content maker who's brilliant at LinkedIn might be lost on TikTok, and vice versa. If LinkedIn is your main channel, it's worth reading how AI can support that specific format without it reading like every other over-polished LinkedIn post, which I've written about in detail here.

The part nobody wants to hear

Content makers are not a fix for an unclear offer. They are not a fix for a website that doesn't say what you do. They are not a fix for a business that hasn't decided who it's for. I say this as someone who's paid for that mistake in real money and real months lost. The role works brilliantly once the thinking is done. It cannot do the thinking for you, no matter how skilled they are with a timeline and a caption. Anyone telling you consistent content alone will fix a shaky business is selling you something, not helping you.

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between a content maker and a social media manager?

A content maker focuses on producing the actual videos, posts, and graphics. A social media manager typically also handles community replies, scheduling strategy, ad spend, and reporting. Small businesses often need one person doing both, but be clear which tasks you're paying for so nothing falls through the gap.

Can AI replace a content maker?

AI can speed up scripting, first drafts, and repurposing long content into shorter pieces, and it's useful for that. It still needs a person to direct it, check tone, film anything on camera, and make judgment calls about what's worth publishing. Right now it's a tool a good content maker uses, not a replacement for one.

How much content should a content maker produce per week for a small business?

For most small businesses, three to five pieces a week across one or two platforms is enough to build momentum without burning out your budget or your audience's patience. More matters less than consistency, five decent posts a week for six months beats twenty a week for three.

Should I hire a content maker before or after I fix my messaging?

After. A content maker turns clear thinking into visible content, but they cannot create the clear thinking for you. Spend an afternoon nailing down who you help and what you want people to do, then hire, and you'll get a far better return on the same money.

Published and maintained by the Lilach Bullock team, covering marketing, AI and business growth.
Your buyers are asking AI who to use. Does it say you?

See for free whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google name you, and get the plan to become the answer.

Check my AI visibility →
Sundays only

Get the Sunday newsletter.

One email a week. AI experiments, marketing tactics, and the workflows Lilach is building right now in her own business.

Subscribe free

Let’s get your marketing running on AI.

Book a free 30-minute call

We figure out what you need, where AI fits in, and what working together would look like.

Book the call →

Or take the 30-second calculator

You’ll see the hours and the money quietly leaking out of your week, and the three workflows worth building first.

Take the calculator →

Or grab the free AI resource library

Prompt packs, templates, checklists, and swipe files. The exact tools I build for paying clients. Yours, free.

Get the library →
Keep reading

More from the blog.