- Grant management tools at a glance
- Ten grant management tools
- How long you must keep federal grant records
- Grantmaker tools versus grant seeker tools
- Setting up a grant round
- Features that matter for funders
- Features that matter for grant seekers
- Being fair to applicants
- Moving off spreadsheets
- My plain advice on grant management software
- Frequently asked questions
The best grant management software keeps applications, reviews, awards and reports in one place, so nobody chases spreadsheets at deadline time. Some tools are built for funders, some for grant seekers and some for both sides. Ten options follow in no particular order.
Grants run on deadlines and paperwork. Whether you give grants or apply for them, the hard part is keeping every application, decision and report organised and easy to find.
The ten tools below are listed alphabetically and in no particular order, most of them from specialist providers. Each description comes from the tool's own site, read this week. If you're writing the applications yourself, my ChatGPT prompts for grant writing can speed up the first draft.
Grant management tools at a glance
In the free plan column, Yes means the tool's own site describes free use or a free plan, Trial only means a time-limited trial and No means neither is stated on the pages we read.
| Tool | Type | Good for | Free plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackbaud Grantmaking | Grantmaker software | Large foundations already on Blackbaud | No |
| Candid | Funder research | Finding and checking funders | Yes |
| Euna Grants | Public sector grants | Government and public sector funding | No |
| Fluxx | Grants platform | Both sides of the funding process | No |
| Foundant | Foundation software | Community and family foundations | No |
| Good Grants | Grant application software | Simple application rounds | Trial only |
| Grantable | AI grant writing | Drafting applications faster | Yes |
| Instrumentl | Grant seeking platform | Finding grants and tracking deadlines | Trial only |
| SmartSimple | Configurable grants platform | Complex, highly configured programmes | No |
| Submittable | Application management | Grants plus CSR programmes | No |
Ten grant management tools
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Best for: Foundations and corporate funders that want configurable grant workflows from a vendor many nonprofits and funders already know.
Candid
Best for: Grant seekers who want to research foundations and nonprofits by name, EIN or keyword before deciding who to approach.
Euna Grants
Best for: Local governments and public bodies that manage grants from discovery to closeout and need compliance tracked at every stage.
Fluxx
Best for: Funders and nonprofits that want grantmaking and grant seeking in one platform built for the whole funding lifecycle.
Foundant
Best for: Community foundations and scholarship providers that want grants, scholarships and stewardship handled in cloud software built for them.
Good Grants
Best for: Smaller grantmakers that want online applications, review and decisions without a heavy or bloated system.
Grantable
Best for: Grant writers at small nonprofits who want AI to draft and reuse application answers so each new bid starts from good material.
Instrumentl
Best for: Nonprofits and grant consultants who want grant discovery, deadlines and applications tracked in one place.
SmartSimple
Best for: Large funders and government agencies running complex programmes that need workflows configured closely to their own process.
Submittable
Best for: Funders and companies running grants or corporate giving programmes that want applications and automations in one place.
How long you must keep federal grant records
Here's a rule US grant recipients can't ignore. 2 CFR 200.334 says recipients and subrecipients must retain all federal award records for three years from the date they submit their final financial report.
If you manage or receive US federal grants, pick software that keeps applications, reports and supporting documents together and makes them easy to find years later. An auditor won't wait while you search old inboxes.
Grantmaker tools versus grant seeker tools
Grantmaker software runs the funding process: application forms, reviewer scoring, award decisions and grantee reporting. Grant seeker software helps nonprofits find opportunities, write applications and track deadlines. A few platforms try to serve both.
Want AI doing the heavy lifting in your marketing?
I build the systems that handle the boring 80 percent, so you get your week back. Done properly, with the human kept in.
Decide which side you're on before you compare features. A foundation needs review workflows and payment tracking, while a small nonprofit mostly needs to find the right funders and never miss a deadline.
Setting up a grant round
- Write clear eligibility rules before you open applications.
- Build the application form and test it with a friendly applicant.
- Set up reviewer scoring and conflict of interest checks.
- Decide how you'll communicate decisions to every applicant.
- Agree reporting dates with grantees at the award stage.
- Keep every document in the system, not in email.
Features that matter for funders
- Online applications. Forms applicants can save and return to.
- Review workflows. Scoring, comments and conflict checks.
- Grantee reporting. Reminders and forms for progress reports.
- Audit trail. A record of every decision and document.
Features that matter for grant seekers
Grant seekers need a calendar of deadlines, a library of reusable answers and a way to track which funders they've approached. Some tools add AI writing help, which is useful for first drafts as long as you check every fact before submitting.
Being fair to applicants
Good software also makes your process fairer. Clear forms, consistent scoring and timely decisions show applicants you respect their time, which builds your reputation as a funder.
Moving off spreadsheets
Many small foundations and nonprofits still run grants from a spreadsheet and a shared inbox. That works until a key person leaves or an auditor asks for a document from three rounds ago. If you're moving to software, start with your next grant round rather than migrating every old file. Set up the forms, invite reviewers and run one full cycle, then bring older records across once you're confident the system works.
Keep the setup simple at first. You can always add extra stages, fields and reports later, but a complicated first round puts reviewers and applicants off.
Do you make grant management software? Tool makers can ask to be considered for a featured place on this list.
My plain advice on grant management software
Choose the simplest tool that handles your whole grant cycle. Funders often buy highly configurable systems and then spend months setting them up. A smaller team with a few grant rounds a year usually does better with something quick to launch.
If you apply for grants, spend more time on research than on software. No software can help if you're applying to funders who were never a fit. Track who funds work like yours, and why, then apply where the match is strong. For how grant income flows once it lands, read how grant funding moves through a nonprofit.
Frequently asked questions
What is grant management software?
It's software that handles grant applications, reviews, awards and reporting in one place, for funders, nonprofits or both.
Is there free grant management software?
Some tools on this list describe free use or free registration. Check the table for each one.
How long must I keep US federal grant records?
2 CFR 200.334 says recipients must keep federal award records for three years from submitting their final financial report.
Can grant software help me find funders?
Grant seeker tools on this list include funder research and databases to help you find opportunities.
Can AI help with grant applications?
AI grant writing tools can draft and reuse answers, but you'll still need to check facts and tailor each application.
Do small foundations need grant software?
If you run more than one grant round a year, software saves a lot of time on applications and reporting.


