If PocketBase feels too small for what you're building, the alternatives fall into four camps: hosted Postgres backends, open-source all-in-one platforms, headless CMS layers and no-code databases. Pick the camp that matches your app first, then compare inside it, because a lightweight backend and a managed platform solve very different problems.
A lightweight backend is a lovely thing when you're prototyping on your own. You get something running quickly, with little to set up, and you're shipping by lunchtime. The trouble starts when the prototype turns into something people rely on, or when a second developer joins and wants things done differently.
That's usually when people start looking around. Sometimes they want more room to grow, sometimes they want somebody else to run the servers, and sometimes they've realised the job was never really a backend at all, it was a content store or a shared database the whole team can edit.
Who this PocketBase comparison is written for
This page is for solo developers and small teams who picked a lightweight backend for speed and now want to know what else is out there. You might be running a side project that's started earning, a small production app with a handful of real users, or an internal tool that's outgrown a spreadsheet. You don't have a platform team, and you don't want one.
If you're an enterprise architect choosing a backend for hundreds of services, this isn't the list for you. Everything here is judged from the seat of one or two people who write the code, run the deploys and answer the support emails.
Ten options side by side
Here's the quick view. The descriptions come from each vendor's own site, trimmed down, so treat them as what each company says about itself.
| Tool | Product type | Good for |
|---|---|---|
| Appwrite | Open-source developer platform | Auth, databases, storage, functions and sites together |
| Baserow | Open-source no-code database | Databases and simple apps without writing code |
| Convex | Reactive backend platform | Fast-moving app and agent projects |
| Directus | Backend and headless CMS | Working over a database you already have |
| Firebase | Google app development platform | Mobile and web apps and games |
| Kuzzle | IoT and data platform | IoT, data and business hypervision |
| Nhost | Managed Postgres backend | Postgres with GraphQL, auth, storage and functions |
| NocoDB | No-code database layer | Turning a database into a no-code tool |
| Strapi | Open-source headless CMS | Content served to any device |
| Supabase | Postgres development platform | Postgres plus auth, APIs, realtime and storage |
Sorting the options by the job your app needs
Before you compare features, decide which of these jobs you're hiring a tool to do. It saves you from comparing a no-code database against a full backend, which never ends well.
A full backend with auth, storage and functions
If you want the closest thing to what you've got now, only bigger, look at Supabase, Appwrite, Nhost, Firebase and Convex. Each one pitches itself as a platform for building apps, though they lean in different directions: Postgres, open source, GraphQL, Google's ecosystem or a reactive model.
A content or data layer over a database
If most of your app is really content, a headless CMS may serve you better. Directus sits over a database you already have, and Strapi gives JavaScript and TypeScript developers an open-source CMS to manage content.
A shared database the team can edit without code
If the people who need the data aren't developers, Baserow and NocoDB both offer no-code ways to work with a database, so colleagues can work with records without waiting on you.
Something more specialised
Kuzzle describes itself as a platform for IoT, data and business hypervision. It's here for completeness; check that it fits a general app backend before you shortlist it.
Every tool, listed in no particular order
The entries below are alphabetical, in no particular order of merit. Each one gets a single line on who it's best for, taken from what the vendor says it does.
Appwrite
Best for: Developers who want one open-source platform covering auth, databases, storage, functions, messaging and site hosting.
Baserow
Best for: Teams who'd rather build databases and small apps in an open-source no-code tool than write backend code.
Convex
Best for: Builders who want a reactive backend that's pitched at teams moving quickly alongside their AI agents.
Directus
Best for: Projects that need a self-hostable backend and headless CMS on top of an existing database, with REST and GraphQL APIs.
Firebase
Best for: Mobile and web app makers who want Google's development platform behind their apps and games.
Want AI doing the heavy lifting in your marketing?
I build the systems that handle the boring 80 percent, so you get your week back. Done properly, with the human kept in.
Kuzzle
Best for: Projects centred on IoT, data and business hypervision rather than a general app backend.
Nhost
Best for: Developers after a managed backend with Postgres, GraphQL, auth, storage and serverless functions in one place.
NocoDB
Best for: Anyone who wants to turn an existing database into a no-code platform the wider team can use.
Strapi
Best for: JavaScript and TypeScript developers who want an open-source headless CMS to manage content and send it to any device.
Supabase
Best for: Apps that need a Postgres database with authentication, instant APIs, realtime, functions, storage and vector embeddings.
What to check before you move off a lightweight backend
- Where your data lives. Moving to a managed service means someone else runs the database, much like choosing between the options in this guide to cloud server hosting. Moving to a self-hosted platform means you still run it, just with more moving parts.
- How auth works. Your users' logins are the hardest thing to migrate. Check how each option handles accounts, sessions and password resets before you write a line of migration code.
- How access rules are written. Lightweight backends often keep rules close to the data. Find out where the new tool expects them to live and who on your team can change them.
- What a local setup looks like. If you loved running everything on your laptop, make sure the replacement still lets you do that.
- How you'd leave again. Ask how you'd export your data if the tool stopped working for you. It's a dull question that saves a lot of pain later, and a look at tools built for moving databases shows what a clean exit involves.
Security deserves its own line here. CISA's Secure by Design guidance argues that cybersecurity should be built into technology products at the design stage, and a backend you run yourself is no exception, so look hard at how auth and access rules are set up before launch, not after your first incident.
My advice for solo developers and small teams
Don't migrate because a bigger name feels safer. Migrate because you've hit a specific limit you can describe in one sentence, like needing a second developer to work on the backend, needing someone else to run the servers, or needing non-developers to edit data. Write that sentence down, find the camp above that answers it, and shortlist two tools from it. Build one small, real feature in each over a weekend and you'll know far more than any comparison page can tell you.
And if nothing on this list answers your sentence, that's a good sign the tool you've got is still the right one.
Do you make a backend platform for small teams? Tool makers can ask to be considered for a featured place on this list.
Want your tool on this list? Featured spots and reviews here are paid partnerships. Here's how to partner with me.
Frequently asked questions
What is PocketBase usually used for?
It's a lightweight backend, the kind of tool people often pick for prototypes and small apps. Check its own site for exactly what it includes.
Should I pick a managed backend or a self-hosted one?
It depends on who you want awake when the database has a problem. A managed service takes the servers off your plate, while a self-hosted option keeps you in control of where data lives. Small teams without anyone on call often lean managed, but read each vendor's own pages to see what they run for you.
Is a headless CMS a real alternative to a backend?
Sometimes. If your app mostly stores and serves content, such as articles, product details or listings, a headless CMS may cover what you need with less code. If your app has complex business logic, you'll probably still want a backend alongside it.
How hard is it to move users' logins to a new backend?
It's usually the trickiest part of any migration. Check whether the new platform can import existing accounts, and how it handles password hashes, before you commit. Plan for some users needing to reset their passwords.
Are these tools ranked?
No. They're listed alphabetically and in no particular order of quality. The right choice depends on the job your app needs done, which is why the page groups them by that job first.
