Asset 20 8 2
Does AI recommend your business? Run the free check →

Join 15,000 business owners, marketers and entrepreneurs. The Sunday newsletter you'll be annoyed only arrives once a week.

Guest posts about streaming are welcome here, whether you run a channel, work on a streaming service or help viewers choose what to pay for. I'm after pitches from people who've done the work and can date every claim, and I decline thin round-ups, republished posts and anything that reads like a press release.

The rules that changed streaming in Britain

Streaming isn't only an entertainment story any more; it's a regulated one. Under the Media Act 2024, UK video-on-demand services with over 500,000 UK users, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and ITVX, come under enhanced Ofcom regulation, according to the GOV.UK announcement on enhanced Ofcom regulation (as of Nov 2026).

The On-demand Programme Services (Tier 1 Services) Regulations 2026 were scheduled to come into effect on 1 April 2026, as the GOV.UK statement on designating Tier 1 services sets out (as of Nov 2026).

And the audience has moved. GOV.UK (24 February 2026) says the number of people using streaming services each month surpasses those watching live TV (as of Nov 2026).

My view as the editor: those three facts are why a streaming article written two years ago can now be wrong. Readers here want to know what changed, who it touches and what they should do differently, from someone who's had to deal with it.

How I check anything you say about regulation

Every claim about a rule needs a date next to it and a link to the official page it came from. If the page says something was scheduled, write scheduled, not done. If you can't find the official wording, leave the claim out.

I'll also check that you've kept services and creators apart. A rule written for large on-demand services isn't automatically a rule for someone streaming live from a spare room, so say what the official page says and stop there. No guessing at what Ofcom might do next.

Opinions are fine, and I'd rather read a sharp one than a safe summary. Just label it as yours.

Story angles hung on what changed

  • What a viewer should expect to look different on a large service now it sits under enhanced Ofcom regulation, written from the viewer's side.
  • How a small production team or channel decides whether any of this touches them, with the official wording quoted and dated.
  • Why households now stream more than they watch live TV, and what that shift means for a creator choosing where to publish.
  • A streamer's working setup for live shows, from someone who runs one every week and can say what broke.
  • Picking a niche service over the giants: a viewer's honest comparison based on months of use, not a press kit.
  • How a brand or small business plans video for people who no longer watch live TV, with the result it got.

Notice that each angle starts from a change and ends with a decision someone has to make. That's the shape I'm looking for.

Dates to keep in your draft

  • 2024: the Media Act 2024, under which large UK video-on-demand services come under enhanced Ofcom regulation.
  • 24 February 2026: GOV.UK says monthly streaming users surpass those watching live TV.
  • 1 April 2026: the Tier 1 Services Regulations 2026 were scheduled to come into effect.
  • Nov 2026: the last time I checked the pages above. Re-check them yourself before you pitch.

Services readers already know

Netflix, Hulu, Paramount, Peacock, Crunchyroll, Mubi, BritBox, ITVX, Tubi and Twitch are the names readers already know. I'm not looking for another overview of any of them; I want pitches that add something these services don't tell people themselves, like how a viewer in a shared household manages four logins, or what a Twitch streamer learnt from a year of schedules.

Mentioning a service is fine when it's part of your story. Writing an advert for one isn't, and I'll decline it.

Getting your idea to me

Use the contact form with one idea, the problem it solves, and one line on why you're the person to write it. If you stream, tell me what you run. If you work on a service, tell me your role. Put the result or the lesson in the first line, not the last.

Before you pitch, read my guide to live streaming software so you don't pitch something I've already covered. If your idea is more about marketing with video than streaming itself, the video marketing contributor page is a better home.

What I won't take: anything under eight hundred words, posts already published elsewhere, generic lists of shows, and pieces that quote a rule without a date. What you get: an edit, a byline, and one contextual link to your own site where it helps the reader.

Before you hit send

Do I need to cite the official pages for every rule I mention?

Yes. Any sentence about a rule gets a date and a link to the official page. If you can't find it on an official page, I'd rather you left it out than guessed.

Can a viewer pitch, or is this only for people who stream?

Both are welcome. Viewers bring the side services don't talk about: cost, sharing, switching and what's worth keeping. Streamers bring setups and schedules. Pick the side you know best.

How long should a streaming article be?

Long enough to cover one idea well. I decline anything under eight hundred words, and I'd rather have a tight piece than a padded one.

Is a link back to my channel or site included?

Yes, one contextual link to your own site or channel, placed where it helps the reader rather than stuck at the bottom.

This already went out on my own blog. Is it still eligible?

No. I only publish articles that haven't appeared anywhere else, including your own site and social posts written as full articles.

Can I draft with AI tools?

Use them to tidy or check spelling if you like, but the experience, the setup and the result have to be yours. Posts that read as machine-written get declined, and I'll edit anything I publish for clarity.